Hazlitt
Society
Home
The Hazlitt Review
Articles on
this site
Poets
and Principles
Tom Paulin
Spirit
of the Age
Tom Paulin
Hazlitt
Day
Ian Mayes
Revival
Time
Ian Mayes
A
Memorial for Hazlitt
AC Grayling
Liberty's
Brightest Star
Tom Paulin
Book reviews
Hone That Satire
David McKie
Radical
Cheek
Michael Foot
Hazlitt Day
2003
Radical
Solution
John Ezard
Reading lists
Select
Bibliography
Duncan Wu
Bibliography
- Critical
Approaches to Hazlitt
Uttara Natarajan
Newsletter
May
2010
Events
Hazlitt
Day-School
5 June 2010
Annual lecture
11 September 2010
Hazlitt
Society Committee
Join
the Hazlitt Society
|
|
The Guardian
14 May 2005
Hone that satire
David McKie

The Laughter of Triumph: William Hone and the Fight for the
Free Press
by Ben Wilson
455pp, Faber, £16.99
In a gloomy room in a tavern in Chancery Lane three friends sat plotting
the destruction of the government. The weapon they meant to deploy was
not the sword or gunpowder: it was ridicule. Their target was George,
the prince regent, and his hardly less ludicrous ministers; all the measures
to which they were turning in desperation — savage censorship, the
repudiation of habeas corpus, the corruption of the right to trial by
one's peers, even brutal armed intervention as practised at Peterloo —
would, this trio calculated over their generous intake of wine and ale,
be powerless against their assault. One of these men was William Hazlitt,
among the most revered and cherished of English writers. A second was
the dissolute but immensely gifted satirical cartoonist George Cruikshank.
And the third was William Hone.
Hazlitt and Cruikshank are familiar enough; but Hone? He is largely forgotten,
a mere Lepidus, the unwary might imagine, in this triumvirate. But the
young historian Ben Wilson thinks it is time he was rescued from his oblivion
and restored to his one-time glory. The claims he makes for his hero are
ambitious and sweeping. Hone pioneered new forms of investigative journalism
and exposure of injustice. He changed for ever the way that crime was
reported in England. Some of his publications deserve to be rated among
the most significant of his day. His satires became an international sensation.
His work left an indelible mark on the consciousness of contemporaries
as few other pieces of journalism can ever have done. And so on. Sometimes
Wilson seems to be pushing a little too hard. But the tale he has to tell
is so exciting, and the bravura with which he recounts it so infectious,
that his case becomes irresistible.
Some of that has to do with the rich assortment of heroes and villains
who surrounded Hone in his heyday. Perhaps the ripest of the villains
here is Lord Justice Ellenborough, with his militant eyebrows and stern
black eye and Cumbrian accent, ruthless dictator to juries of what they
ought to think, and creature of the administration — "I am
yours," he assured home secretary Sidmouth, "and let the storm
blow from what quarter of the hemisphere it may, you shall always find
me at your side." As he saw it, his duty, in whose performance he
deployed every kind of bullying, was to defend those in power against
their evil, seditious critics, since otherwise anarchy lurked round every
corner. Not far behind, though, is the poet Southey, who amid the clamour
for political and parliamentary reform declared: "It is the people
at this time who stand in need of reformation, not the government."
Dr Stoddart, editor of the Times, then a distinguished component of a
"venal hireling press" which suppressed without instruction
both the reformist case and even such evidence given in courtrooms as
did not suit the interest of the administration, had an honoured place
in their pillory too, under the appropriate sobriquet Dr Slop.
Hone's greatest moment of triumph, and the most compelling of many effective
set pieces in Wilson's book, came with his prosecution in 1817 for a publication
which neatly and deliberately combined blasphemy with sedition —
a mockery of authority which parodied the liturgy. Wilson's accounts of
the three successive trials his hero faced is wonderfully stirring. In
each case his defence, which he conducted himself, having no funds to
do otherwise, swept the jurors away. What happens to me, he kept reminding
them, is for you to decide, not for the presiding judge. Ellenborough,
announcing after Hone's first acquittal that he'd try the remaining cases
himself, was powerless to prevent the gales of laughter and applause that
greeted Hone's spontaneous eloquence. The jury in the final case cleared
him in 20 minutes. One of the jurors said later that he had been prepared
to die "rather than pronounce a man 'guilty' who was manifestly prosecuted,
not for blasphemy or sedition, but for exposing abuses which were eating
into the very heart of the nation". Ellenborough was broken. He resigned,
left the public stage and within a year was dead.
Hone's triumph — the triumph of laughter, to invert Wilson's title
— made him from then on virtually unassailable. Dangerous as his
journalism might be, giving him the platform which prosecution afforded
could only make him more dangerous still. And his fight for the rights
of free speech and free publication duly prevailed, to the benefit of
all who came after. Wilson's final sequence charts a decline. With George,
his favourite ministers and the attitudes they represented gone, his particular
talents were no longer relevant. The enemy had been driven from the field.
The school of satire which he and Cruikshank created — and as Wilson
accepts, Hone's impact would have been dulled without the supplementary
power of Cruikshank's cartoons — fell into abeyance. Even Southey
now classed him as inoffensive. The old investigative crusader took to
publishing books of entertainment and anecdote. His debts, always formidable,
overtook him and saw him imprisoned. His fine collection of books —
lustfully assembled with little regard for the crying want of his suffering
wife and children — had to be sold. Long before his final illness
and death he was drifting into oblivion.
Yet oblivion, in a curious way, was a form of redemption. The old blasphemer
became a deeply religious man, hiring his old journalistic talents out
to a non-conformist paper campaigning for ecclesiastical reform. The old
radical had turned conservative. He now repented his former brilliance
and the uses to which it had been put. The new political climate, and
the promise of legislation on libel which vindicated his long and spirited
fight for press freedom, brought him no joy. "By the mid-1820s",
says Wilson, "he had become as much a relic of the Regency years
as Sidmouth, Castlereagh and the laws of blasphemous and seditious libel."
The book's concluding pages — his decline amid his ill-used but
loving family, his death, his funeral at Abney Pa
|